- In 1930 KURT GÖDEL proved 2 mathematical theories which stated that every system axiom rich enough to define arithmetic is either incomplete or contradictory. An incomplete system means a system where it’s possible by means of that system to formulate statements which can be neither proved nor refuted. And a contradictory one means a system where it’s possible by means of that system to formulate statements which can be both proved and refuted. Our environment does not maintain such contradictions meaning it does not maintain a single phenomenon which could be considered both existent and not existent at the same time. By force of this, it’s clear that every system axiom, describing nature, will be incomplete. There will constantly arise situations which cannot be explored on the basis of already existent laws of nature, it means that one continually has to reveal new laws, on and on again. But god is by definition the ultimate cause of all reasons. From a mathematical point of view it means that an introduction of an axiom about god makes our whole system axiom complete. If god exists, well then every single statement can be either proved or refuted pleading on god no matter how. But a complete system axiom is inevitably contradictory. That is, if we consider that god exists then we are forced to come to the conclusion that contradictions are possible in nature. So far as there are no contradictions, otherwise the whole world of ours would crumble because of these contradictions, one has to come to the conclusion that the existence of god is not compatible with that of nature. So, there may be either god or nature. As a direct part of nature, I sense it's existence continuously and therefore I have to come to the conclusion that god still does not exist.
- What associations do you have with the words "New Jerusalem"?